Madras High Court

WP(MD)/26515/2026 of P.Jeyaraj Vs The District Collector on 17 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 17.09.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

and

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

WP(MD) NO. 26515 of 2026

{CNR: HCMD011280702026}

Case QR

&

W.M.P.(MD)No.20000 of 2026

P.Jeyaraj

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector,

Pudukkottai District

Pudukkottai.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer

Illuppur Division

Pudukkottai District.

3.The Tahsildar

Viralimalai Taluk

Pudukkottai District.

4.The Assistant Engineer

Water Resource Department

Irrigation (Special) Wing

Viralimalai

Pudukkottai District.

5.N.Kamarasu

... Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 4th respondent vide his proceedings Form II dated 20.08.2026 and quash the same as illegal.

For Petitioner

:Mr.B.Ramnath

For Respondents

: Mrs.K.R.Shivashankari

Additional Government Pleader

for R1 to R4

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The petitioner has approached this Court at the Form II stage itself.

2. It appears that the petitioner was not put on notice earlier. The

2. It appears that the petitioner was not put on notice earlier. The petitioner is permitted to lodge his objections before the fourth respondent petitioner is permitted to lodge his objections before the fourth respondent within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Before issuing within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Before issuing Form III, the fourth respondent is obliged to consider the petitioner's objections Form III, the fourth respondent is obliged to consider the petitioner's objections and pass a speaking order. If an adverse order is passed and Form III has to be and pass a speaking order. If an adverse order is passed and Form III has to be issued, the petitioner will be given breathing time of four issued, the petitioner will be given breathing time of four weeks thereafter, weeks thereafter, during which, he can approach this Court and seek relief. during which, he can approach this Court and seek relief.

3. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

[G.R.S., J.] [B.P., J.] 17.09.2026 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No rmi To

1. The District Collector, Pudukkottai District Pudukkottai.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Illuppur Division Pudukkottai District.

3. The Tahsildar Viralimalai Taluk Pudukkottai District.

4. The Assistant Engineer Water Resource Department Irrigation (Special) Wing Viralimalai Pudukkottai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J and B.PUGALENDHI, J. rmi W.P(MD)No.26515 of 2026 17.09.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead