Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5213/2026 of Hari Prakash Vs The Commissioner of Police on 16 September 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 16.09.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN
WP Crl.(MD) NO. 5213 of 2026
{CNR: HCMD011279052026}
Case QR
Hari Prakash
... Petitioner
.Vs.
1. The Commissioner of Police
Office of the Commissioner of Police
Madurai City.
2. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By
The Inspector Of Police
Avaniyapuram Police Station
Madurai City.
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd Respondent to provide adequate Police Protection to me for peacefully cleaning the Property and putting up compound wall and to take appropriate action in accordance with law against the persons who are unlawfully interfering with the peaceful possession and threatening the petitioner by considering the petitioner's representation dated 16.08.2026.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Palmurugan
For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
( Uploaded on: 18/09/2026 11:17:52 am )
WP.Crl.(MD)No.5213 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the prayer framed in the present writ petition is not sufficiently clear. Consequently, the learned counsel for the Petitioner not pressed the present application at this stage and seeks liberty to file a fresh writ petition with full and clear particulars. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect, praying that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty.
2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the same subject matter containing proper and necessary details. 16.09.2026 TM To
1. The Commissioner of Police Office of the Commissioner of Police Madurai City.
2. The Inspector Of Police Avaniyapuram Police Station Madurai City.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor,
( Uploaded on: 18/09/2026 11:17:52 am )
WP.Crl.(MD)No.5213 of 2026 Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
( Uploaded on: 18/09/2026 11:17:52 am )
WP.Crl.(MD)No.5213 of 2026 DR.P.MURUGAN, J., TM WP.Crl.(MD).No.5213 of 2026 16.09.2026
( Uploaded on: 18/09/2026 11:17:52 am )