Madras High Court

WP CRL.(MD)/5214/2026 of Selvakumar Vs The Superintendent of Police on 16 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 16.09.2026

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN

WP Crl.(MD) NO. 5214 of

{CNR: HCMD011291822026}

Case QR

Selvakumar

... Petitioner

.Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police,

Karur District, Karur.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Karur Town Sub-Division,

Karur.

3. The Inspector of Police

Villiyanai Police Station

Karur.

... Respondents

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to remove his name from history sheeted rowdies list which is being maintained by the 3rd respondent police as H.S.No.4 of 2019 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 01.08.2026.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.L.Dhilipan Pandian For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to remove his name from history sheeted rowdies list which is being maintained by the 3rd respondent police as H.S.No.4 of 2019 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 01.08.2026.

2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate, (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents. Heard the counsel on either side and perused the records.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner's complaint/representation may be disposed of by the respondents.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner has one previous case.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above said previous case was ended in aquittal. Though the representation has been given to remove the petitioner's name from the history sheet on 01.08.2026 itself, it is pending till now without any progressing. Hence, he seeks suitable direction to the respondents.

6. This Court, without going into the merits of the case, directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's complaint/representation dated 01.08.2026, after affording an opportunity of hearing to both sides, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 16.09.2026 TM To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Karur Town Sub-Division, Karur.

3. The Inspector of Police Villiyanai Police Station Karur.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

DR.P.MURUGAN, J., TM WP.Crl.(MD).No.5214 of 2026 16.09.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead