Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5219/2026 of J.Thoufic Vs The Commissioner of Police on 16 September 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 16.09.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN
WP Crl.(MD) NO. 5219 of
{CNR: HCMD011302182026}
Case QR
J.Thoufic
... Petitioner
.Vs.
1. The Commissioner of Police
O/o.The Commissioner of Police
Madurai City.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police
O/o.The Assistant Commissioner of Police Anna Nagar Police Station Anna Nagar Range Madurai City.
3. The Inspector of Police
K.Pudur Police Station
Madurai City.
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents particularly 1st respondent to remove the petitioner name in H.S.No.19 of 2019 which is pending against the petitioner, on the file of the 3rd respondent by considering the petitioner's representation dated 05.09.2026.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Jamaldeen
( Uploaded on: 18/09/2026 11:17:52 am )
WP.Crl.(MD)No.5219 of 2026
For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents particularly 1st respondent to remove the petitioner name in H.S.No.19 of 2019 which is pending against the petitioner, on the file of the 3rd respondent by considering the petitioner's representation dated 05.09.2026.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate, (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents. Heard the counsel on either side and perused the records.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner's complaint/representation may be disposed of by the respondents.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner is involved in two previous cases. It is stated that out of the two cases, the case involving the offence under Section 302 of IPC has already ended in acquittal, whereas the case registered under Section 506(ii) of IPC is currently pending trial.
( Uploaded on: 18/09/2026 11:17:52 am )
WP.Crl.(MD)No.5219 of 2026
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that out of the two cases one case was ended in acquittal. Though the representation has been given to remove the petitioner's name from the history sheet on 05.09.2026 itself, it is pending till now without any progressing. Hence, he seeks suitable direction to the respondents.
6. This Court, without going into the merits of the case, directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's complaint/representation dated 05.09.2026, after affording an opportunity of hearing the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 16.09.2026 TM To
1. The Commissioner of Police O/o.The Commissioner of Police Madurai City.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police O/o.The Assistant Commissioner of Police Anna Nagar Police Station Anna Nagar Range Madurai City.
( Uploaded on: 18/09/2026 11:17:52 am )
WP.Crl.(MD)No.5219 of 2026
3. The Inspector of Police K.Pudur Police Station Madurai City.
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
( Uploaded on: 18/09/2026 11:17:52 am )
WP.Crl.(MD)No.5219 of 2026 DR.P.MURUGAN, J., TM WP.Crl.(MD).No.5219 of 2026 16.09.2026
( Uploaded on: 18/09/2026 11:17:52 am )