Madras High Court

CRP/25/2022 of SRINIVASA REDDY Vs S.VIJAYA on 28 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRP No. 25 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL

CRP No. 25 of 2022

CNR:{HCMA010446082021}

and

CMP.Nos.181 of 2022 & 306, 311 & 312 of 2023

1. Srinivasa Reddy

S/o. Late. Chenna Reddy,

Chichuruganapalli Village,

Sevaganapalli Post,

Krishnagiri Taluk And District.

2. Geethamma

W/o. Srinivasa Reddy,

Chichuruganapalli Village,

Sevaganapalli Post,

Krishnagiri Taluk And District.

3. Kumar

S/o. Srinivasa Reddy, Chichuruganapalli

Village, Sevaganapalli Post,

Krishnagiri Taluk And District.

4. Madhu

S/o. Srinivasa Reddy, Chichuruganapalli

Village, Sevaganapalli Post,

Krishnagiri Taluk And District.

...Petitioners/

Petitioners/

Defendants

Vs

S.Vijaya

W/o. Narayana Reddy,

Andhivadi Village, Hfc Mathigiri Post,

Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

...Respondent/

Respondent/

CRP No. 25 of 2022

Plaintiff

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to set aside the Fair and Decreetal order of the Learned District Munsif at Hosur dated December 15, 2020 in IA No.476 of 2017 in OS

No.311 of 2008 and allow the above Civil Revision Petition.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.B.Bharath Kumar for Mr.V.Nicholas

For Respondent(s):

SOLE RESPONDENT - DIED (STEPS Taken)

Vide Cmp 306,311 & 312/2023

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Mr. B. Bharath Kumar, representing Mr. V. Nicholas, learned counsel on record for the revision petitioner, is before this Court.

2. The learned representing counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties and that the suit in O.S. No. 311 of 2008, on the file of the learned District Munsif, Hosur, was disposed of on June 13, 2024. Hence, the prayer sought for in the present civil revision petition has become infructuous. To that effect, learned counsel for the revision petitioner has made an endorsement in the case file. A scanned

CRP No. 25 of 2022

reproduction of the same is as follows:

3. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by learned counsel for the revision petitioner, the present civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petitions are closed.

28-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No JRS To The District Munsif Court, Hosur.

CRP No. 25 of 2022

R.SAKTHIVEL J. JRS CRP No. 25 of 2022 and CMP.Nos.181 of 2022 & 306, 311 & 312 of 2023 28-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead