Madras High Court
CRP/3506/2024 of THULASIBAI Vs DEVANATHAN on 28 October 2026
CRP No. 3506 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
CRP No. 3506 of 2024
CNR:{HCMA011068572024}
AND
CMP NO. 19015 OF 2024
Ramanathan (Died).
1. Thulasibai
W/o. Ramanathan, No.9/15,
Sandhaithoppustreet, Marakanam and Post, Tindivanam Taluk.
2. Premalatha
W/o. Kandavel, Selliamman Koil Street,
Marakanam and Post, Tindivanam Taluk.
3. Malathi
W/o. Raviselvam, Pillaithottam, Puducherry.
4. Vinayagamurthi
S/o. Ramanathan,
No.9/15, Santhaithoppustreet,
Marakanam and Post, Tindivanam Taluk
5. Valli
S/o. Rajendran,
Poonthottam, Tindivanam
6. Udayakumar
S/o. Ramanathan,
No.9/15, Sandhaithoppustreet,
Marankanam and Post, Tindivanam Taluk.
7. Janardhanan
S/o. Raviselvam,
Pillaithottam, Puducherry
...Petitioners/
CRP No. 3506 of 2024
Petitioners/
Plaintiffs
Vs
1. Devanathan
S/o. Gopalkounder, Konavayankuppam,
Marakanam, Tindivanam Taluk.
2. Vijayakumar
S/o. Devanathan, Kovayankuppam,
Marakanam, Tindivanam Taluk
3. Sakthivel
S/o. Raman,
Konavayankuppam,
Marakanam, Tindivanam Taluk
4. Jayaraman
S/o. Ezhumalai,
Konavayankuppam,
Marakkanam,Tindivanam Taluk
5. Janarathanan
S/o. Ramakrishnan,
Vaddaagaram,
Orranipancyhayath,
Marakkanam, Tindivanam Taluk.
...Respondents/
Respondents /
Defendants.
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,1950, praying to set aside the order passed in IA No.98/2020 in OS No.90
of 2015 dated 18.04.2024 pending on the file of Learned Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam.
CRP No. 3506 of 2024
For Petitioners:
Mr.V.Narayanan for Mr. S.N.Subramani
For Respondents 1 & 2:
Mr.Divine Rojer .A
For Mr. S.Kingston Jerold
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Mr. V. Narayanan, representing Mr. S. N. Subramani, learned counsel on record for the revision petitioner, and Mr. A. Divine Rojer, representing Mr. S. Kingston Jerold, learned counsel on record for respondents 1 and 2, are before this Court.
2. Mr. A. Divine Rojer, learned representing counsel for respondents 1 and 2, submits that the suit in O.S. No. 90 of 2015, on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam, was dismissed for default on August 8, 2024.
3. This Court has perused the relevant particulars available on the e- Courts portal in open Court. It is seen that the suit was listed under the special list on August 8, 2024, and that the plaintiff and the learned counsel on record for the plaintiff were present before the Court but failed to adduce evidence. Hence, the suit was dismissed for default. Since the suit itself was dismissed for default, the prayer sought for in the present civil revision petition has become infructuous.
CRP No. 3506 of 2024
4. Hence, the present civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed. 28-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No JRS To The Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam.
CRP No. 3506 of 2024
R.SAKTHIVEL J. JRS CRP No. 3506 of 2024 AND CMP NO. 19015 OF 2024 28-10-2026