Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/18923/2026 on 28 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.18923 of 2026
Decided on: 28.10.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mukesh Sharma
…..Petitioner
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Rakesh K Dogra, Advocate vice Mr. S.P. Chatterji, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Deepak Sharma, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents in the respective matters.
2. Petitioner seeks direction to the respondents to grant him the benefit of pay fixation after counting the approved military service rendered by him in Armed Forces.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already preferred representation to
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 29/10/2026 08:32:31 :::CIS
2 respondent No.1 on 05.08.2026 (Annexure P-5) for claiming the above relief. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to decide the aforesaid representation within a fixed time schedule. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents is not averse to this prayer.
4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.1/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-5) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 28, 2026
Judge R.Atal High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 29/10/2026 08:32:31 :::CIS