Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/18972/2026 on 28 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 18972 of 2026 along with
connected matters.
Decided on : 28
th October,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 18972 of 2026. Amita Sharma & Ors. ...Petitioners.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
2. CWP No. 19001 of 2026. Suman Sharma ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
3. CWP No. 19000 of 2026. Anita kumari & Anr. ...Petitioners.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
Coram:
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Advocate, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhas, Advocate, Ms. Khem Raj, Advocate and Mr. Nitin Rishi, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Mr. L. N. Sharma, Learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
3. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations (annexed with the respective petitions), seeking applicability of Mohit Sharma & Anr. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
5. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. 2 CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 28th October, 2026.
(jai)