Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/18983/2026 on 28 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP No.18983 of 2026

Decided on: 28.10.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amar Kaur .

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors.

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coram

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate vice Mr.

A.K.Gupta, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Sikandar Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 4.

Mr. Dikken Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Notice. Mr. Sikandar Bhushan, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Dikken Kumar, learned counsel appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4 and respondent No.5, respectively.

2. Petitioner seeks applicability Roop Lal Vs. State of HP and Ors2. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not preferred any representation for 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 LPA No. 196 of 2022 decided on 11.10.2023 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 29/10/2026 08:33:13 :::CIS

2 the redressal of her grievances raised in the writ petition.

3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above decision within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner.

The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua October 28, 2026

Judge R.Atal

High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 29/10/2026 08:33:13 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead