Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/18997/2026 on 28 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA

CWP No. 18970 of 2026 along with

connected matters.

Decided on : 28

th October

, 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. CWP No. 18970 of 2026. Anil Kumar ...Petitioner.

Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.

2. CWP No. 18997 of 2026. Anu Bala ...Petitioner.

Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.

3. CWP No. 18973 of 2026. Kundan Sharma ...Petitioner.

Versus State of H.P. & Anr.. ....Respondents.

4. CWP No. 18992 of 2026. Shashi Sharma ...Petitioner.

Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents.

5. CWP No. 18993 of 2026. Ravinder Kumar ...Petitioner.

Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents.

6. CWP No. 18994 of 2026.

Naresh Kumar ...Petitioner.

Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents.

7. CWP No. 18995 of 2026. Uma Devi ...Petitioner.

Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents.

8. CWP No. 18996 of 2026. Dinesh Kumar ...Petitioner.

Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ....Respondents.

9. CWP No. 18998 of 2026. Kuldeep Singh ...Petitioner.

Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.

10. CWP No. 18999 of 2026. Bhed Ram

...Petitioner.

Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.

Coram:

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Pankaj Thakur and Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocates. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

For the respondents: Mr. L. N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Mr. L. N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. Petitioners seek applicability of Ghanshyam Dass and Ors Vs. State of H.P. and Ors.2.

3. Learned Additional Advocate General has apprised that aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No. 205 of 2025 and other connected matters.

4. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions, therefore, are disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners within six weeks after the adjudication of LPA No. 205 of 2025 and in terms thereof. 2CWP No. 2056 of 2023 decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024

5. With the above observations, the writ petitions stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 28th October, 2026.

(jai)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead