Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19008/2026 on 28 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 19002 of 2026 along with
connected matters.
Decided on : 28
th October, 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 19002 of 2026 Kheera Mani ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
2. CWP No. 19004 of 2026 Vinod Kumar ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
3. CWP No. 19005 of 2026 Sushma Devi ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
4. CWP No. 19006 of 2026 Mitter Dev ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
5. CWP No. 19007 of 2026 Lalit Kumar ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
6. CWP No. 19008 of 2026 Tharma Devi ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
7. CWP No. 19003 of 2026 Dinesh Kumar ...Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
Coram:
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. M.A. Safee, Advocate, Mr. Pranav Kaushal, Advocate, Mr. Sameer Miyan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L. N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General for the respondents-State.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Mr. L. N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents- State.
2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage.
3. Petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to count their contract services for the purpose of annual increments, seniority, promotion and all other consequential benefits. They seek applicability of the decision rendered in Taj Mohammad and others Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others2. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 CWP No.2004 of 2017 decided alongwith connected matter on 03.08.2023.
It is an admitted position that the “Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024” has been quashed and set aside in Devinder Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr3. It is also a matter of record that State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. Vs. Devinder Kumar & Ors.4 instituted by the State of Himachal Pradesh against the aforementioned judgment, has been dismissed by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 29.07.2026. While dismissing the appeal, the Hon’ble Apex Court granted four months’ time to the State Government to do the needful in terms of the judgment.
4. In view of above, the present petitions are disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners for the grant of relief prayed for by them, in accordance with the time-line indicated by the Hon’ble Apex Court. The petitioners are at liberty to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of their surviving grievances, if any, at an appropriate stage, in case, necessity so arises, in future. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 28th October, 2026.
(jai)
3 CWP No. 3361 of 2025 decided alonwith connected matters on 25.04.2026 4 Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24885/2026 decided on 29.07.2026