Himachal Pradesh High Court

COPC/1440/2026 on 28 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

2026:HHC:47300

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

COPC No.1440

of 2026

Decided on: 28

th October, 2026

_______________________________________________________ Man Singh ....Petitioner Versus Ashish Kohli

...Respondent ________________________________________________________

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Hemant Kumar Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)

Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced copy of instructions dated 28.10.2026 issued by the Deputy Director School Education (Elementary), Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., which are taken on record.

2. A perusal of the aforesaid instructions reveals that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and he has been allowed higher pay scale of Rs.40,100/- after two years of regular services, subject to final outcome of LPA filed in CWP No.4830 of 2023, titled as Inder Singh and any other legal remedies. The DDO concerned has been directed to fix the pay of the petitioner and release the arrears.

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 29/10/2026 08:34:52 :::CIS

3. Since the competent authority had only been directed to decide the representation made by the petitioner, the mandate contained in the judgment has duly been complied with and as such contempt notice issued to the respondent is discharged. However, since the petitioner has been held entitled to the benefits, in case, the arrears on account of allowing higher pay scale is not released in favour of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today, he shall be at liberty to avail an appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

4. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

th October, 2026

( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 29/10/2026 08:34:52 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead