Madras High Court
ARB APPLN/1483/2026 of TATA CAPITAL LTD Vs Fahad K on 26 October 2026
__________
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Arb Appln No. 1483 of 2026
Tata Capital Limited,
By its Manager & Legal Remedial,
Ram Kumar Sathya Moorthy,
Having its office at
1st Floor, Centennial Square,
6A – Dr. Ambedkar salai,
Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024,
Tamil Nadu.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
Fahad K
..Respondent(s)
Prayer:
Judges Summon filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with Section 9(II)(b),(d) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to pass an order Appointing Mr.Pranoy, Employee Code: 867217 currently employed in the applicant Company as Receiver to seize and deliver the asset as mentioned in the SCHEDULE, with police aide or break open the premises from wherever found and handover the same to the applicant.
For Petitioner(s):
Ms.M.Usha Nandini
( Uploaded on: 28/10/2026 04:36:53 pm )
Arb Appln No. 1483 of 2026
__________
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the applicant would submit that already the Arbitral Tribunal has passed an award. The private notice, issued to the respondent, is served. The vehicle is yet to be seized by the party receiver.
2. Even though notice is served, the respondent has not chosen to appear before this Court and oppose this application.
3. In view thereof, the order, dated 24.07.2026 is made absolute.
4. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. No costs. 26-10-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No PSS
( Uploaded on: 28/10/2026 04:36:53 pm )