Himachal Pradesh High Court
FAO/35/2014 on 28 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:47190 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA FAO(MV) No.35 of 2014 Date of Decision: 28.10.2026 ___________________________________________________ Buta Singh ....Appellant Versus Gurdev Singh and others …Respondents ___________________________________________________
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the appellant: None. For the respondents: Ms. Vanshika Bagga, Advocate, vice Mr. J.S. Bagga, Advocate, for
respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. Respondent No.37 ex-parte. Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate, vice Ms.Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Notice issued to the appellant received back duly served, however, he is not present despite service. Learned counsel for the appellant has also not appeared, despite the case having been called several times. Therefore, it appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 29/10/2026 08:35:13 :::CIS
2026:HHC:47190 Hence, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) October 28, 2026
Judge (V. Himalvi) High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 29/10/2026 08:35:13 :::CIS