Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1658/2026 on 28 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:47297
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1658
of 2026
Decided on: 28
th October, 2026
_______________________________________________________ Mehar Chand and others ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & others
...Respondents ________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners: Mr. Aman Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Balvinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General. . Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced instructions dated 22.10.2026 issued by the Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh and copies of office orders dated 23.09.2026 and 21.09.2026, passed by the Deputy Director School Education (Elementary), Shimla, District Shimla-171004, H.P. and Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary), Mandi, District Mandi (H.P.) respectively, which are taken on record.
2. A perusal of the aforesaid office orders reveals that the petitioners have been allowed higher pay stage of Rs.40,100/- after two years of regular services, subject to final outcome of LPA filed
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 29/10/2026 08:35:28 :::CIS
in CWP No.4830 of 2023, titled as Inder Singh and any other legal remedies. The DDOs concerned have been directed to fix the pay of the petitioners and release the arrears.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 29.12.2025, passed in CWP No.20577 of 2025, titled, Dr. Banita Rani & Ors. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. has been complied with qua the petitioners in the execution petition, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, in case, the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioners in terms of the judgment sought to be executed within a period of eight weeks from today, they shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the present execution petition.
4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
th October, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 29/10/2026 08:35:28 :::CIS