EX.P./2570/2026 on 28 October 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADSH AT SHIMLA

Ex. Petition No. 2570 of 2026 Decided on: 28.10.2026 ___________________________________________________________ Indira Kumari and others

....Petitioners Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh and others ....Respondents

Coram :

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?

For the petitioner : Mr. Mohit Dogra, Advocate.

For the respondent : Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General. ____________________________________________________________ Ranjan Sharma, Judge

Petitioner has come up before this Court, seeking execution/implementation of the order/judgment dated 09.01.2025 [Annexure P-1], passed in CWP No. 660 of 2025, titled as Indira Kumari and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. whereby, a Coordinate Bench of this Court had passed the following orders:-

5. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

( 2026:HHC:47182 )

representations of the petitioners in accordance with law 3 within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners.”

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that after the passing of the judgment dated 09.01.2025 [Annexure P-1] the petitioner had made request to the Director of Elementary Education of Himachal Pradesh on 25.03.2025 [Annexure P-2 Colly] requesting to implement the judgment, but nothing has been done till date, whereas entire monetary benefit has been extended to other similarly placed persons.

3. Heard.

4. Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General waives service of notice on behalf of the Respondents.

5. At this stage, Learned Counsel submits that petitioner shall be satisfied, in case, the Respondent- Competent Authority decides the representation of the petitioner, in a time bound manner. [Statement taken on record]

6. Considering the matter in above perspective, this Court directs the Respondent/Competent Authority to

( 2026:HHC:47182 )

decide the representation, in terms of the order/judgment, within six weeks positively.

7. Needless to say, that in case, the order/judgment is not complied with in terms of this order, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy, hereinafter, in accordance with law.

8. In aforesaid terms, instant petition and all the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Ranjan Sharma)

Judge

October 28, 2026 (Anita)