Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2572/2026 on 28 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADSH AT SHIMLA
Ex. Petition No. 2572 of 2026 Decided on: 28.10.2026 ___________________________________________________________ Subhash Chand (Now deceased) through its LRs.
.....Petitioner Versus HRTC and Others
....Respondents
Coram :
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner : Mr. Jitender Singh Advocate vice to Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Kanwar Virender Singh, Advocate.
: Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General. ____________________________________________________________ Ranjan Sharma, Judge
Petitioner has come up before this Court, seeking execution/implementation of the order/judgment dated 10.01.2025 [Annexure E-3], passed in CWP No. 16385 of 2024, titled as Subhash Chand versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others whereby, a Coordinate Bench of this Court, had passed the following orders:-
3. This writ petition is accordingly disposed
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Page 1 of 3
( 2026:HHC:45437 )
of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-11, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein as well as the judgments being relied upon by the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law.”
2. Upon listing of the matter today, Learned Counsel for Respondent-Corporation submits that the judgment stands complied with and an amount of Rs. 44,403/-, on account of arrears of dearness relief has been released to the petitioner, namely Lakshmi Devi, widow of deceased petitioner, by Respondent-Corporation in terms of the communication dated 28.10.2026 [Taken on record].
3. In view of communication dated 28.10.2026, Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Respondent-Corporation may be directed to make necessary remittances to the bank account of the petitioner, if not already done.
4. Considering the matter in above perspective, the instant proceedings are closed, with direction to the Respondent-Corporation to remit the above amount in the
Page 2 of 3
( 2026:HHC:45437 )
bank account of the petitioner, Lakshmi Devi, as aforesaid, within a week from today. In aforesaid terms, since the judg- ment stands complied with, therefore, present proceedings are closed.
5. In aforesaid terms, instant petition and all the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge
October 28, 2026 (Anita)
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…