Madras High Court
ARB APPLN/1679/2026 of MS CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY L Vs MR SATNAM GAKHAL on 26 October 2026
__________
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26-10-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Arb Appln No. 1679 of 2026
M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and
Finance Company Ltd,
..Petitioner
Vs
Satnam Gakhal
..Respondent
Prayer: Judge's Summon under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Section 9 (1) (ii) (c) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to pass an order appointing as receiver of Mr. LOVEPREET SINGH currently designated as BRANCH RECEIVABLE MANAGER of M/S. Cholamandalam Investment and finance company Limited having his office at chola crest, C54
55, super B-4, Thiru-vi-ka industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai- 600032, to visit the respondents premises, other areas which is occupied by the Respondent and any other premises of the Respondent along with Local police protection to break open if necessary, and to seize and take custody of the vehicle hypothecated with applicant being Model - THAR LX HARD TOP DIESEL
MT RWD, Chassis No. - MA1UJ2TZ2P2G37670, Engine No. TZPZG06471, and bearing Registration No. - PB-72-B-6699 with all accessories fitted to the asset specifically described in the schedule to the Judges Summons and hand them over to the applicant pending final adjudication of the disputes between parties through arbitration.
For Petitioner:
Mr. T.Gowri Shankar
for M/s.San Law Partners LLP
For Respondent:
No Appearance
( Uploaded on: 28/10/2026 06:22:42 pm )
Arb Appln No. 1679 of 2026
__________
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that the final hearing of the arbitration is pending. It is further submitted that the private notice issued to the respondent has been served, but the vehicle is yet to be seized by the party receiver.
2. Even though notice is served, the respondent has not chosen to appear before this Court and oppose this application.
3. In view thereof, the order, dated 19.08.2026 is made absolute.
4. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. 26-10-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No GRS
( Uploaded on: 28/10/2026 06:22:42 pm )