Madras High Court
ARB APPLN/1680/2026 of TATA CAPITAL LTD Vs Jyotsanaben Mansukhpari Gauswami on 26 October 2026
__________
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26-10-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Arb Appln No. 1680 of 2026
M/s. Tata Capital Limited,
By its Manager & Legal Remedial,
Ram Kumar Sathya Moorthy
..Petitioner
Vs
Jyotsanaben Mansukhpari Gauswami
..Respondent
Prayer: Judges Summon under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with Section 9 (II) (b),(d) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to pass an order Appointing Mr.Vipul Kothari, Employee Code: 545174 currently employed in the applicant Company as Receiver to seize and deliver the asset as mentioned in the Schedule, with police aid or break open the premises from wherever found and handover the same to the applicant.
For Petitioner:
Mr. N.K.Vanan
For Respondent:
No Appearance
( Uploaded on: 28/10/2026 06:22:43 pm )
Arb Appln No. 1680 of 2026
__________
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that the arbitral proceedings have been initiated and are pending. It is further submitted that the private notice issued to the respondent has been served, but the vehicle is yet to be seized by the party receiver.
2. Even though notice is served, the respondent has not chosen to appear before this Court and oppose this application.
3. In view thereof, the order, dated 19.08.2026 is made absolute.
4. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. 26-10-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No GRS
( Uploaded on: 28/10/2026 06:22:43 pm )