Central Administrative Tribunal
Neeraj Gautam vs BSNL on 27 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH 61/35, COPERNICUS MARG,NEW DELHI-110001 Order Sheet Item no.: 21 O.A./4228/2026 (NAINITAL) [ TRANSFER ] Court No.: 999 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 27/10/2026 NEERAJ GAUTAM Vs BSNL
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. K K Tiwari For Respondent(s) Advocate : Ms. Anjali Bhargava Order of The Tribunal Heard on admission. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is challenging his transfer order whereby he has been transferred from the post of AGM, Dehradun to Chamoli Distt. Headquarters. The impugned transfer order qua the applicant is contrary to sub-rule 5 of Rule 10 of the BSNL (Recognition of Executives' Association) Rules, 2014 and the applicant is immune from the transfer till 18.01.2029 and the respondents have issued Circle Office Order dated 15.07.2026 providing transfer immunity to the applicant upto 18.01.2029 and retaining him at Dehradun. The applicant has a legally enforceable right under sub-rule 5 of Rule 10 of the BSNL (Recognition of Executives' Association) Rules, 2014. Learned counsel for the respondents, on advance notice, vehemently argued that the applicant has been provided the facility of concession of immunity from transfer once, and for the second time he is not entitled for the said immunity from transfers, as the facility once enjoyed will not be available for the second time. So also submits that the applicant has been relieved on 15.10.2026. Issue notice to the respondents. Ms Anjali Bhargava, learned counsel, appears on advance service and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and service of notice to the respondents is waived of. Learned counsel for the applicant presses for consideration of grant of ad- interim protection. Learned counsel for the respondents vehemently opposes such grant of ad-interim protection and seeks short time to obtain instructions in the matter. Request is acceded to. List the case on 29.10.2026 for consideration of grant of interim relief.
Rajinder Kashyap Member (A) Ajay Pratap Singh Member (J) Karan ( steno 'd' )