Madras High Court

ARB APPLN/638/2026 of MS CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LT Vs BHOLA NATH on 14 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Arb Appln No. 638 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

Arb Appln No. 638 of 2026

M/s Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Company Ltd Chola crest, C54-55 & super B-4, Thiru-vi-ka Industrial Estate,Guindy, Chennai

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

Bhola Nath

Vishram Pur Mohaddi Nagar,

Uparhar Pratapgarh,

Near Market, Kunda,

Uttar Pradesh 230 201.

..Respondent(s)

To an order appointing as receiver of Mr. VIPIN SINGH currently designated as Branch Receivable Manager of M/S. Cholamandalam Investment and finance company Limited having his office at chola crest, C54 55, super B-4, Thiru-vi-ka industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600032, to visit the respondents premises, other areas which is occupied by the Respondent and any other premises of the Respondent along with Local police protection to break open if necessary, and to seize and take custody of the vehicle hypothecated with applicant being Model ULTRA 1518 4530/CAB, Chassis No.

MAT764020J7K25571, Engine No. 5LNGDICR17KRY511709, and bearing Registration No. - UP93BT8114 with all accessories fitted to the asset specifically described in the schedule to the Judges Summons and hand them over to the applicant pending final adjudication of the disputes between parties through arbitration.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.R.Ashok Kumar

M/s.San Law Partners Llp

Arb Appln No. 638 of 2026

For Respondent(s):

Sole Respondent - Court Notice Sent Service Awaited Private Notice - Aos Filed D.No. 08/06/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the applicant would submit that already, the arbitration is initiated. The private notice, issued to the respondent, is served. The vehicle is yet to be seized by the Party Receiver.

2. Even though notice is served, the respondent has not chosen to appear before this Court and oppose this application.

3. In view thereof, the order, dated 17.06.2026 is made absolute.

4. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. 14-10-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No GRS

Arb Appln No. 638 of 2026

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. GRS Arb Appln No. 638 of 2026 14-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead