Madras High Court
CRP/4892/2026 of B.J.Expo Private Limited Vs Ychem Agency on 11 September 2026
CRP Nos. 4892 and 4896 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11-09-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
CRP Nos. 4892 and 4896 of 2026
and CMP Nos.21378 and 21397 of 2026
B.J.Expo Private Limited
B.Jayaraman, No.14, Alamathi Road,
Vellanur, Avadi, Chennai
Petitioner in both the revisions
Vs
Ychem Agency
rep by its Proprietor, M.K.Hariprasad,
No.60, Gangadeeshwarar Koil street,
Purasawalkam, Chennai
Respondent in both the revisions
Revisions filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code challenging the common fair and decretal order dated 08.06.2026 passed in I.A.Nos.2 and 1 of 2025 in O.S.No.3375 of 2012on the file of IV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.V.C.Janarthanam
For Mr.S.Balakrishnan
For Respondent(s):
Mr.Prakash Goklaney
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER
Heard Mr.V.C.Janarthanam, representing for Mr.S.Balakrishnan, counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Prakash Goklaney, learned counsel for the respondent/decree
( Uploaded on: 21/09/2026 06:45:11 pm )
CRP Nos. 4892 and 4896 of 2026 holder.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent, I find that the Trial Court has found from the records that summons have been served privately and affidavit of service has also been filed by producing the original acknowledgment card. Therefore, I am unable to accept the arguments advanced on the side of the petitioner that there has been no proper service of summons in the suit before the petitioner was set exparte. Consequently the argument that the application was filed within 492 days from the date of knowledge is not acceptable.
3. However, considering the age of the respondent/decree holder and also the fact that the petitioner has already made a deposit of Rs.10,00,000/-(Rupees Ten Lakhs only) in compliance with the conditional order passed by this Court, I suggested to the parties to reach a one time settlement.
4. Mr.Prakash Goklaney, learned counsel for the respondent/decree holder, on instructions, submitted that his client is willing to give a quietus, provided the petitioner pays further sum of Rs.15,00,000/-(Rupees Fifteen Lakhs Only) in addition to Rs.10,00,000/-(Rupees Ten Lakhs Only) already deposited.
( Uploaded on: 21/09/2026 06:45:11 pm )
CRP Nos. 4892 and 4896 of 2026
5. However, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, came forward with a counter proposal that he would pay an additional sum of Rs.10,00,000/-(Rupees Ten Lakhs Only) in full quits, provided reasonable time is granted for such payment.
6. Learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions from the respondent, who is also present in court, has agreed to the said offer.
7. In the light of the above, while confirming the impugned order, both the civil revision petitions are disposed of in the following manner:-
(i) The respondent shall record full satisfaction of the decree in his favour, for a sum of Rs.20,00,000/-(Rupees Twenty Lakhs Only);
(ii) A sum of Rs.10,00,000/-(Rupees Ten Lakhs Only) having been already deposited shall be paid out to the respondent/decree holder, at the earliest, by the Executing Court on a formal application being filed in this regard, which
( Uploaded on: 21/09/2026 06:45:11 pm )
CRP Nos. 4892 and 4896 of 2026 shall P.B.BALAJI.,J sr not be opposed by the learned counsel for the petitioner/petitioner/judgment debtor.
(iii) Insofar as the remaining sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten lakhs only), the said sum shall be paid to the respondent/decree holder directly within a period of eight weeks from today without seeking any further extension of time. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 11.09.2026 sr Index:yes/no Website:yes/no Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order
( Uploaded on: 21/09/2026 06:45:11 pm )
CRP Nos. 4892 and 4896 of 2026 To The IV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai
( Uploaded on: 21/09/2026 06:45:11 pm )
CRP Nos. 4892 and 4896 of 2026 P.B.BALAJI.,J sr CRP Nos. 4892 and 4896 of 2026 11.09.2026
( Uploaded on: 21/09/2026 06:45:11 pm )