Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5167/2026 of M.Kamala Vs The Superintendent of Police on 11 September 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 11.09.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE P. MURUGAN
WP.CRL.(MD). No.5167 of 2026
M. Kamala
... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police,
Ramanathapuram,
Ramanathapuram District.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Rameshwaram DSP Office,
Ramanathapuram District.
3. Inspector of Police,
Thangachimadam, Police Station,
Rameswaram,
Ramanathapuram District.
4. The Taluk Suveyor,
Rameswaram Taluk Office,
Ramanathapuram District.
5. The Tahsildar,
Rameswaram Taluk Office,
Ramanathapuram District.
... Respondents
PRAYER :- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Police 1 to 3 to afford adequate and necessary police protection to the Petitioner, based on the representation dated 23.07.2026, to enable her to peacefully carry out the fencing work in respect of the lands comprised in Old Survey No.197/1, presently bearing New Survey No.197/1B, which have already been duly surveyed and demarcated by the competent Government authorities, and consequently direct the respondents to prevent any unlawful obstruction, interference or disturbance to the petitioner in carrying out the said fencing work.
For Petitioner : M/s. S. Lekshmana Abish For Respondents : Mr. D. Rajaboopathy Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
for R1 to R3.
Mr. A. Sivasubramanian
Additional Government Pleader
for R4 and R5.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Heard both sides.
2. Mr. D. Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3 and
Mr. A. Sivasubramanian, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents 4 and 5.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement in the bundle to that effect.
4. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
11.09.2026 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No
psm To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram, Rameshwaram Dsp Office, Ramanathapuram District.
3. Inspector of Police, Thangchimadam, Police Station, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District.
4. The Taluk Suveyor, Rameswaram Taluk Office, Ramanathapuram District.
5. The Tahsildar, Rameswaram Taluk Office, Ramanathapuram District.
6. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
DR. P. MURUGAN, J.
psm
WP. CRL.(MD) No.5167 of 2026 11.09.2026