Madras High Court
CONT P/1097/2025 of Jeganathan Vs The Chairman (Shri.M.K. Rajagoplan) and another on 10 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N. MALA
Cont. P.No. 1097 of 2025
1.Jeganathan
2.Balachandra
3.Dhalakshmy
4.Adhilakshmi.D
5.Swaminathan
6.Sasikala
7.Uma
8.Prabakaran
9.Lakshmy
10.Kalaivani
11.Rajina
12.Valarmathi.R
13.Gowri.P
14.Chandralekha
15.Priyadharshini
..Petitioner (s)
Vs
1. The Chairman (Shri M.K.Rajagopalan)
Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Chief Secretary to Government Chief Secretariat, Puducherry.
2. The Director (Dr.C.Udaya Shankar)
Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Vazhudavoor Road Puducherry 605 009.
..Respondent(s)
Prayer:
This contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court dated 01.11.2022 in Cont.P.No.1001 of 2020 in WA.No.684 of 2019.
For Petitioner :
Mr. B.Balavijayan
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
(Order of the Court was made by P.T.Asha J.) The connected matter in Cont.P.No.1096 of 2025 was dismissed by orders of a Division Bench of this Court dated 07.07.2026. The contempt petition was dismissed stating as follows: “5. We do not think that such a prayer can be entertained by us, more so, when the claim of the petitioners for regularisation was rejected by this Court. The benefit of regularisation could be extended only to those persons, who had worked for considerably long time and can't be extended to the persons like the petitioners, who had worked maximum of 60 days. Hence we find that no cause has been made out to proceed in the Contempt Petition. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is dismissed.
2. The said order applies to the facts of the present case. Accordingly, this contempt petition is also dismissed. (P.T.A.,J.) (N.M.,J.) 10-09-2026 KAN
P.T.ASHA J. AND N.MALA J. KAN Cont P.No. 1097 of 2025 10-09-2026