Madras High Court
OSA/27/2022 of M. JAYACHANDRAN Vs RAVICHANDRAN on 10 September 2026
OSA No. 27 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GK.MUTHUKUMAAR
OSA No. 27 of 2022
M. Jayachandran
..Appellant(s)
Vs
1. Ravichandran
2. Shamraj
3. Gunasekaran
4. Thilagavathi
5. Gomathi
6. Poorna Bai
7. The Manager
Syndicate Bank, No.9/10, Thyagaraya Road, Chennai 17.
8. Mohamed Salim Sait
9. L.K.Deepu
10.Reshmi Deepu
11.Khalelullah
12.Sathyakannan
13.N.Sivakumar
14.N.Vijayaraman
..Respondent(s)
This Original Side Appeal is filed under Order 36 Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules r/w Section 15 of the Letters Patent, against the judgment and decreetal order passed by the Learned Judge of this Court dated 16-12-2019 in
C.S.No.857 of 2018.
For Appellant(s):
Mr.V.K.Sathiamurthy
For Respondent(s):
Mr.P. Navaneethakrishnan for R8 & R12
Mr.T.Padmanadhan for R13 & R14
No appearance for remaining respondents
( Uploaded on: 16/09/2026 01:35:03 pm )
OSA No. 27 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by P.Velmurugan J.) When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled and that pursuant to the said settlement, a memo dated 10.09.2026 to that effect has also been filed before this Court. He would further submit that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the appellant does not intend to prosecute the present appeal and therefore, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The learned counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. This Court has carefully considered the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and has also perused the memo showing the settlement arrived between the parties and the endorsement made by him.
3. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn as settled out of Court. The terms of settlement arrived at between the parties shall form part of the decree. (P.V.,J.) (G.K.M.,J.) 10-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VKR
( Uploaded on: 16/09/2026 01:35:03 pm )
OSA No. 27 of 2022
To The Sub Assistant Registrar (Original Side), High Court of Madras.
( Uploaded on: 16/09/2026 01:35:03 pm )
OSA No. 27 of 2022
P.VELMURUGAN, J. AND GK.MUTHUKUMAAR, J. VKR OSA No. 27 of 2022 10-09-2026
( Uploaded on: 16/09/2026 01:35:03 pm )