Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5109/2026 of Rameshkumar Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Repr on 10 September 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 10.09.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN
WP.Crl.(MD).No.5109 of 2026
Rameshkumar
... Petitioner
.Vs.
1.State Represented by
The Superintendent of Police,
Officer of the Superintendent of Police, Surveyor Colony, Alagar Kovil Road, Madurai (City) Madurai (Dist)
2.The Inspector of Police,
Othakadai Police Station,
Madurai East Taluk,
Madurai District.
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd Respondent to complete the speedy enquiry on the complaint of the petitioner dated 05.07.2026 and to take necessary action accordance with law within the time stipulated.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajasekaran
For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd Respondent to complete the speedy enquiry on the complaint of the petitioner dated 05.07.2026 and to take necessary action accordance with law within the time stipulated.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate, (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents. Heard the counsel on either side and perused the records.
3. Since the respondents have not passed any order, the petitioner has come forward with the present petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a suitable direction may be issued to the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 05.07.2026.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that, though the petitioner might have sent the complaint dated 05.07.2026 to the first respondent, namely, the Superintendent of Police, no such complaint has been received by the second respondent either directly from the petitioner or through the first respondent. It is further submitted that, if the petitioner submits a fresh representation before the second respondent, the same will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed in accordance with law.
5. Recording the above submission, the petitioner is directed to submit a fresh representation before the second respondent. On receipt of such representation, the second respondent shall consider and dispose of the same after conducting due enquiry with the petitioner as well as the rival party, in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the above direction, the petition is disposed of. 10.09.2026 TM To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Officer of the Superintendent of Police, Surveyor Colony, Alagar Kovil Road, Madurai (City) Madurai (Dist)
2. The Inspector of Police, Othakadai Police Station, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
DR.P.MURUGAN, J., TM WP.Crl.(MD).No.5109 of 2026 10.09.2026