Madras High Court

WP CRL.(MD)/5113/2026 of Rameswari Vs The Superintendent of Police on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 10.09.2026

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN

WP.Crl.(MD).No.5113 of 2026

Rameshwari

... Petitioner

.Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police

Madurai District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent Of Police,

Melur, Madurai District.

3.The Inspector of Police

Keelavalavu Police Station,

Melur, Madurai District.

... Respondents

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing respondents No.1 and 2 to consider the petitioners representation dated 21.08.2026 and take appropriate action to restrain the 3rd respondent from interfering in the civil dispute in respect of the property measuring 1 Acre 38 Cents in Survey No.160/1A, Ambalakaranpatti, Melur Taluk, Madurai District and consequently, not to harass the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property till the disposal of W.P.No.17514 f 2026.

For Petitioner : Mr.Kannan Gurusami

For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing respondents No.1 and 2 to consider the petitioners representation dated 21.08.2026 and take appropriate action to restrain the 3rd respondent from interfering in the civil dispute in respect of the property measuring 1 Acre 38 Cents in Survey No.160/1A, Ambalakaranpatti, Melur Taluk, Madurai District and consequently, not to harass the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property till the disposal of W.P.No.17514 f 2026.

2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate, (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents. Heard the counsel on either side and perused the records.

3. Since the respondents have not passed any order, the petitioner has come forward with the present petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a suitable direction may be issued to the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 21.08.2026.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the representation of the petitioner is pending with the respondent police for enquiry.

5. This Court, without going into the merits of the case, directed the respondents 1 & 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.08.2026, after hearing both sides and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, the petition is disposed of. 10.09.2026 TM To

1. The Superintendent of Police Madurai District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Melur, Madurai District.

3. The Inspector of Police Keelavalavu Police Station, Melur, Madurai District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

DR.P.MURUGAN, J., TM WP.Crl.(MD).No.5113 of 2026 10.09.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead