Central Administrative Tribunal
S R Venkatesh vs SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY on 27 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD (TELANGANA) NO. 5-10-193, 1ST FLOOR, HACA BHAVAN,HYDERABAD - 500004 Order Sheet Item no.: 11 O.A./121/2026 (ANDHRA PRADESH) [ RECOVERY ] With M.A./372/2026 FOR FILING ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 11 Order Dated: 27/10/2026 S R VENKATESH Vs SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY
For Applicant(s) Advocate : C VIJAYA LAKSHMI
For Respondent(s) Advocate : B SIVA SANKAR Order of The Tribunal Learned counsels for the parties are present. In an affidavit filed on 16.09.2026, learned counsel for the respondents has cited paras 9,10 & 14 to 16 of the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Chandi Prasad Uniyal vs. State of Uttarakhand & Ors., (2012) 8 SCC 417 in Civil Appeal No. 5899/2012. Contradicting the said judgement, learned counsel for the applicant states that it is an old judgment, and she has relied upon the judgment in Amolak Sing Chhabra vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Others in Writ Petition No. 6885/2019 at para. 10 &
11. It is stated that the applicant has retired, and no undertaking has been taken from him. The applicant also submitted written notes of submission.
Both the parties are directed to provide certain clarification about the cadre of the applicant by the next date of hearing. Accordingly, MA/372/2026 filed for additional documents is allowed. Post the matter on 29.10.2026. Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi Member (A) K Adilaxmi ( court master )