Central Administrative Tribunal
P Padma Chary vs POST TELANGANA CIRCLE on 15 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD (TELANGANA) NO. 5-10-193, 1ST FLOOR, HACA BHAVAN,HYDERABAD - 500004 Order Sheet Item no.: 3 O.A./25/2026 (TELANGANA) [ ALLOWANCES ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 9 Order Dated: 15/10/2026 P PADMA CHARY Vs POST TELANGANA CIRCLE
For Applicant(s) Advocate : B GURUDAS
For Respondent(s) Advocate : P NARAYANA Order of The Tribunal Counsel for both the parties are present. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that, in their reply, the respondents have stated that the sanctioned establishment of Budharam Branch Post Office consists of two GDS posts, namely,
(i) GDS Branch Postmaster (BPM) and (ii) Assistant Branch Postmaster (ABPM), as evidenced from the establishment records. However, Annexures 8 and 9, as given by them, clearly show that the concerned ABPM, though shown as posted as GDSMC, BO, with his headquarters at AO. This aspect requires further clarification from the respondents as to how he is not working at Budharam Branch Office. Learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, seeks time to file an additional reply to the rejoinder submitted on 29.09.2026. Three weeks' time is granted for the said purpose.
List the case on 04.11.2026.
Shalini Misra Member (A) Prachi Bhaskar ( court master )