Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5065/2026 of T.Kathirvel Vs The State of Tamilnadu, rep on 9 September 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 09.09.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN
WP.Crl.(MD).No.5065 of 2026
T.Kathirvel
... Petitioner
.Vs.
1.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep.
By the Superintendent of Police,
O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur.
2.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep.
By the Deputy Superintendent of Police,
O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Karur.
3.State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Karur, Karur District.
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to complete the speedy enquiry on the representations of the petitioner dated 07.08.2026 and to take necessary action in accordance with law within the time stipulated.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Joel Paul Antony
For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to complete the speedy enquiry on the representations of the petitioner dated 07.08.2026 and to take necessary action in accordance with law within the time stipulated.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate, (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents. Heard the counsel on either side and perused the records.
3. Since the respondents have not passed any order, the petitioner has come forward with the present petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a suitable direction may be issued to the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 07.08.2026.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the representation submitted by the petitioner to the second respondent has been received by the third respondent on 10.08.2026 and the same is under consideration.
5. Recording the above said submission, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directed the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.08.2026, after hearing both sides and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the above direction, the petition is disposed of. 09.09.2026 TM To
1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Karur.
3. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Karur, Karur District.
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
DR.P.MURUGAN, J., TM WP.Crl.(MD).No.5065 of 2026 09.09.2026