Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5067/2026 of K.Malarvizhi Vs The Superintendent of Police on 9 September 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 09.09.2026
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE P.MURUGAN
WP.Crl.(MD).No.5067 of 2026
K.Malarvizhi
... Petitioner
.Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police
O/o.The District Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.
2.The Inspector of Police
Mallankinaru Police Station,
Virudhunagar District.
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent police to provide adequate police protection to enter petitioner and petitioners children in to the house which was built by petitioners late husband with his hard earned money and also to use the things and vessels kept in the house based on the petitioner's complaint dated 15.06.2026.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Veerapandi
For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent police to provide adequate police protection to enter petitioner and petitioners children in to the house which was built by petitioners late husband with his hard earned money and also to use the things and vessels kept in the house based on the petitioner's complaint dated 15.06.2026.
2. Mr.D.Rajaboopathy, learned Government Advocate, (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents. Heard the counsel on either side and perused the records.
3. Since the respondents have not passed any order, the petitioner has come forward with the present petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a suitable direction may be issued to the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 15.06.2026.
4. Recording the above said submission, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directed the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 15.06.2026, after hearing both sides and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. With the above direction, the petition is disposed of. 09.09.2026 TM To
1. The Superintendent of Police O/o.The District Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.
2. The Inspector of Police Mallankinaru Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
DR.P.MURUGAN, J., TM WP.Crl.(MD).No.5067 of 2026 09.09.2026