Central Administrative Tribunal
mahammed Ateequlla vs SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY on 27 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE Order Sheet Item no.: 3 O.A./451/2025 (BANGALORE) [ PENSION ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 21 Order Dated: 27/10/2026 MAHAMMED ATEEQULLA Vs SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Proxy counsel Shri Malagoud Patil for Shri Aravind Patil - through video conference For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri K. Gajendra Vasu Order of The Tribunal Proxy counsel Shri Malagoud Patil on behalf of the arguing counsel Shri Aravind Patil for the applicant through video conference. Shri K. Gajendra Vasu on behalf of the respondents. The case was listed for final arguments today. However, the proxy counsel for the applicant submits that the arguing counsel could not come due to exigencies of work and requests for a short accommodation. It is seen from the order sheets dated 24.08.2026 and 05.10.2026, that none appeared on behalf of the applicant on those dates. Today again, the proxy counsel has asked for a short accommodation. This is a last chance. If none appears on behalf of the applicant on the next date of hearing, then appropriate action will be taken, as per law. List the case again on 27.11.2026.
SANTOSH MEHRA Member (A) Chhaya Verma ( steno 'd' )