Central Administrative Tribunal

SINDHU SHYLESH vs ISRO on 26 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE Order Sheet Item no.: 7 O.A./270/2026 (BANGALORE) [ TRANSFER ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 6 Order Dated: 26/10/2026 SINDHU SHYLESH Vs ISRO

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Shri M A Narayana For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri Vishnu Bhat Order of The Tribunal Shri M A Narayana on behalf of the applicant. Shri Vishnu Bhat on behalf of the respondents. Arguments commenced but not concluded. The learned counsel for the applicant in brief submitted the following grounds for getting the relief:

(i) The husband of the applicant is posted in Ahmedabad and relied on the Policy of the Government of India to keep the spouses together at the same station.

(ii) A CVC circular no. 22/10/22 dated 25.10.2022 which speaks about the sensitive posts and rotational transfer of the officials occupying such posts

(iii) The parents and in-laws of the applicant are having medical issues. He futher points out that it appears that there is no clear defined policy in ISRO which gives room for arbitrariness and favouritism. He also submits that the initial transfer of the applicant to ISRO in June, 2019 was on working arrangment basis and was she promoted at the same place in June, 2019. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents points out that the applicant got regular promotion in June, 2019 and then as per adminstrative exigencies, she was retained in the same place. The learned counsel for the respondents is requested to furnish the following:

(i) The original Transfer Order of the applicant which indicates her posting at HSFC, Bangalore on Working Arrangement basis

(ii) OMs/Circulars/SOPs related to the distinction between a Regular transfer/posting and deployment on Working Arrangement basis with special reference to temporariness or otherwise of deployment on Working Arrangement basis

(iii) Transfer/Posting policy of ISRO with a special reference to Minimum and Maximum tenure. List the case as part-heard case on 26.11.2026.

SANTOSH MEHRA Member (A) Chhaya Verma ( steno 'd' )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead