Central Administrative Tribunal

MURULI H D vs SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY on 23 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE Order Sheet Item no.: 8 O.A./87/2025 (BANGALORE) [ COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 18 Order Dated: 23/10/2026 MURULI H D Vs SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Shri P. Sreedhara on behalf of Shri B. S Venkatesh Kumar For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri S. Sugumaran Order of The Tribunal Proxy counsel Shri P. Sreedhara on behalf of arguing counsel Shri B. S Venkatesh Kumar for the applicant. Shri S. Sugumaran on behalf of the respondents. Proxy counsel for the applicant requests for another two weeks' time as the arguing counsel is unwell today. Learned counsel for the respondents was requested on the previous occasion, to furnish details regarding time limit fixed for representations on compassionate appointment. He also requests for another two weeks' time for the same. Time is granted. List the case on 25.11.2026.

SANTOSH MEHRA Member (A)

Taru Lata ( steno 'd' )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead