PRATIBHA KUMARI vs DEPTT OF POSTS on 26 October 2026

1. Pratibha Kumari, Aged about 22 years, D/o- Sri Bindeshwari Singh, residing of Ward No. 20, Rupdih Bara Tola, District- Motihari- 845401. At present resident at Village & PO- Dheng, via- Barharwa, PS- Suppi, District- Sitamarhi. 843315.

2. Lovely Kumari, Aged about 27 years, D/o- Sri Amar Baitha, resident of Village & PO- Dheng, Ward No. -5, Bengahi Tola, via Barharwa, Maniari, PS- Suppi, District- Sitamarhi- 843315.

3. Manisha Kumari, Aged about 30 years, D/o Sri Narayan Baitha, resident of Village & PO- Dheng, Ward No. -5, Via Barharwa, PS- Suppi, District- Sitamarhi. 843315.

4. Dharmendra Baitha, aged about 27 years, S/o Sri Una Shankar Baitha, resident of Village- Pakri Kothi, Ward No. -5, PO- Barharwa, PS- Suppi, District- Sitamarhi. 843315.

………….Petitioner

VS.

Sonali Lal Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Location:

Sonali Lal

1. Mr. Pawan Kumar, The Postmaster General, Department of Posts, Northern Region, Muzaffarpur- 842002. And his successors.

2. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Laskar, The Superintendent of Post Offices, Sitamarhi Division, Sitamarhi- 843302. And his successors.

........ Respondents

For The Applicant(s): Mr. Jayant Kumar Karn

For The Respondent(s): Mr. T. N. Thakur

O R D E R (ORAL) Per : Justice Narendra Kumar Johari, Judicial Member

1. Heard Learned Counsel for the parties.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that, during the pendency of the present Contempt Petition, the respondents have complied with the directions contained in the order dated 30.04.2025 passed by this Tribunal in OA No. 135/2024. He further submits that the respondents have physically verified the petitioners’ documents and have also issued appointment orders to them.

3. Learned Counsel for the respondents concurs with the submissions made by Counsel for the petitioners and submits that an affidavit of compliance to the aforesaid effect has also

Sonali Lal Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Location:

Sonali Lal been filed and placed on record. He, therefore, submits that, in view of the compliance with the directions issued by this Tribunal, the present Contempt Petition has lost its efficacy and prays that the same be dropped.

4. In view of the submission made by Counsel for the parties, the Contempt Petition stands dropped. Notices issued, also stands discharged.

Sd/-

Sd/- (Kumar Rajesh Chandra) (Justice Narendra Kr. Johari) Administrative Member

Judicial Member

sl

Sonali Lal Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Location:

Sonali Lal