Central Administrative Tribunal
NASEEM KOUSAR vs SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT on 26 October 2026
:: 1 ::
O.A. No. 61/1478/2026
Central Administrative Tribunal
Jammu Bench, Jammu
Hearing through video conferencing
Original Application No. 61/1478/2026
This the 26th day of October, 2026
Hon’ble Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Judicial Member Hon’ble Ms. Pragya Sahay Saksena, Administrative Member
1.
Naseem Kousar, Aged 35 years, D/o Hakim Din & W/o Shri Amjed Iqbal, R/o Chowdhary Nar, District Rajouri, CPIS No.
RAJEDU00130214.
...Applicant
(Through Advocate: Mr. Nonu S Khera)
Versus
1.
UT of J&K through Commissioner/Secretary School Education Department, Civil Secretariat, Jammu/Srinagar.
2.
Director School Education, Muthi, Jammu.
3.
Chief Education Officer, Rajouri.
4.
Zonal Education Officer, Baljrallan, District Rajouri.
(Through Advocate: Mr. Sudesh Magotra, A.A.G.)
ARUN
KUMAR
:: 2 ::
O.A. No. 61/1478/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
(Per:- Pragya Sahay Saksena, Administrative Member)
Mr. Nonu S Khera, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted the applicant is aggrieved of Order No. CEOR/E2/15192- 95 dated 14.10.2026, issued by Respondent No. 3, whereby she has been directed to report back to her original place of posting i.e. Government Middle School, Sanukot, Zone Baljrallan and the consequential relieving order dated 15.10.2026, issued by Respondent No. 4. Learned counsel further submitted that for redressal of her grievance, the applicant had submitted a detailed representation dated 17.10.2026 before Respondent No. 3 requesting reconsideration of the impugned order and withdrawal of the consequential relieving order, on the ground of her own ill health and ailing mother-in-law, besides she is a mother of three young children, including an infant of approximately 10 month of age, however, no decision has been taken on the same uptil now.
2. Learned counsel also submitted that the applicant will be satisfied, at this stage, if this O.A. is disposed of with direction to respondents to decide the pending representation dated 17.10.2026, within a time frame and till such time, the applicant may be protected.
3. Mr. Sudesh Magotra, learned A.A.G. appearing for respondents, on advance notice, prayed for sometime to file reply.
4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered view that no useful purpose would be served in keeping
ARUN KUMAR
:: 3 :: O.A. No. 61/1478/2026
this O.A. pending and same can be disposed of with directions to respondents.
5. Accordingly, this O.A. is disposed of, at the admission stage itself, without entering into the merits of the case, with direction to respondents to consider and decide the pending representation of the applicant dated 17.10.2026, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, keeping in view the medical condition of the applicant. A copy of the speaking order be also communicated to the applicant. Let the entire exercise be completed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
6. Till then, the respondents are restrained from taking any coercive measures against the applicant to make her join at her original place of posting in terms of impugned transfer order dated 14.10.2026.
7. There shall be no orders so as to costs.
(Pragya Sahay Saksena)
(Sanjeev Gupta)
Administrative Member
Judicial Member
Arun…
ARUN KUMAR