Madras High Court

REV.APLW/249/2026 of GUPALLISAMY Vs P.SIVARAJ on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

REV.APLW No. 249 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

REV.APLW No. 249 of 2026

and

WMP No.42088 of 2026

Gupallisamy

..Petitioner

Vs

1. P.Sivaraj

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Sub Collector Office,

Hosur – 635 115,

Krishnagiri District.

3. The Tahsildar,

Taluk Office,

Hosur – 635 115,

Krishnagiri District.

4. The Block Development Officer,

Panchayath Union,

Hosur,

Krishnagiri District – 635 115.

..Respondents

Prayer: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of

C.P.C., pleased to review the order passed in W.P.No. 2540 of 2024 dated 05.03.2024 by allowing the present review petition.

( Uploaded on: 22/09/2026 04:48:25 pm )

REV.APLW No. 249 of 2026

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.R.Jayaprakash

For Respondent(s):

Mr.R.Bharathkumar [R1]

Mr.R.Haswanth

Government Advocate [R2 to R4]

*****

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The grounds raised by the review petitioner is that a civil suit has been instituted by the review petitioner. If at all any such suit has been instituted, it is left open to the petitioner to secure appropriate reliefs on merits and in accordance with law from the competent court of law. However, this Court disposed of the writ petition recording the instructions given by the learned Government Advocate through the departmental officials. Thus, there is no error on the face of record.

2. Accordingly, the Review Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (D.B.C.,J.) 08-09-2026 Index: No Speaking order Neutral Citation: No sp

( Uploaded on: 22/09/2026 04:48:25 pm )

REV.APLW No. 249 of 2026

To

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sub Collector Office, Hosur – 635 115, Krishnagiri District.

2. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Hosur – 635 115, Krishnagiri District.

3. The Block Development Officer, Panchayath Union, Hosur, Krishnagiri District – 635 115.

( Uploaded on: 22/09/2026 04:48:25 pm )

REV.APLW No. 249 of 2026

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. sp REV.APLW No. 249 of 2026 08-09-2026

( Uploaded on: 22/09/2026 04:48:25 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead