Madras High Court
REV.APLW/250/2026 of THE MANAGING DIRECTOR Vs COONOOR CONSUMBER PROTECTION ASSOCIATION on 8 September 2026
REV.APLW No. 250 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
REV.APLW No. 250 of 2026
and
WMP No.42106 of 2026
1. The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore) Ltd, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore – 43.
2. The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore) Ltd., Udagamandalam Division, Central Bus Stand, Udagamandalam, The Nilgiris.
..Petitioners
Vs
1. Coonoor Consumer Protection Association, No.57-60, YMCA, Mount Road, Coonoor, The Nilgiris-643 102, Rep. by its President.
2. The Secretary,
Home (Transport VI) Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai – 09.
3. The Regional Transport Officer,
Udhagamandalam,
The Nilgiris.
..Respondents
REV.APLW No. 250 of 2026
Prayer: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of C.P.C. and Section 114 of C.P.C., pleased to allow the Review Application and set aside the order dated 23.02.2024 made in W.P.No. 30282 of 2019.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.Murali Vinodh
For Respondent(s):
Mr.A.R.Suresh
Special Government Pleader [R2 & R3]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The grounds raised in the review petition appears to be irrelevant in the context of the issues considered by this Court in the order sought to be reviewed. This Court has not issued any direction causing prejudice to the interest of the review petitioners, namely Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore) Ltd.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that an application filed before the Government is pending. Thus, the petitioners are at liberty to pursue the said application. However, no ground has been made out to review the order.
REV.APLW No. 250 of 2026
3. Accordingly, the Review Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (D.B.C.,J.) 08-09-2026 Index: No Speaking order Neutral Citation: No sp To
1. The Secretary, Home (Transport VI) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 09.
2. The Regional Transport Officer, Udhagamandalam, The Nilgiris.
REV.APLW No. 250 of 2026
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. sp REV.APLW No. 250 of 2026 08-09-2026