Madras High Court
REV.APLW/44/2025 of K.AMUDHA Vs C.MANIKANDAN on 8 September 2026
REV.APLW No. 44 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
REV.APLW No. 44 of 2025
AND
WMP Nos. 2461 & 2462 OF 2025
1. K.Amudha
2. M.Chandira
3. K.Sagunthala
4. M.Rajakumari
5. S.Padmavathy
6. E.Vijaya
7. R.Rajendran
8. K.Kasambu
9. K.Neelavathy
10.K.Rani
11.J.Amudha
12.M.Amirthavalli
13.N.Sethu
14.V.Paneerselvi
15.S.Savathri
16.S.Chitra
17.P.Kavitha
18.N.Rajakumari
19.V.Chitra
20.A.Rajagowri
21.M.Mageshwari
22.V.Kalaimathi
23.M.Kanchana
24.R.Vasanthi
... Petitioners
Vs
1. C.Manikandan
REV.APLW No. 44 of 2025
2. The District Collector,
Cuddalore District,
Cuddalore – 607 001.
3. The Tahsildar,
Bhuvanagiri Taluk,
Cuddalore District.
4. The Executive Engineer,
(Water Resources Department),
Kollidam Drainage Division,
Chidambaram, Chidambaram Taluk,
Cuddalore District.
5. The Senior Project Officer,
(Water Resources Department),
Kollidam Drainage Division,
Chidambaram, Chidambaram Taluk,
Cuddalore District.
... Respondents
Prayer: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of
C.P.C., pleased to review the order dated 12.12.2023 passed in Writ Petition No.34273 of 2023 and to consequential dismiss the Writ Petition No.34273 of 2023 filed by the first respondent herein as devoid of merits and abuse of process of law.
For Petitioners
: Mr.K.Raju
For Respondents
: Mr.R.Haswanth
Government Advocate [R2 to R5]
*****
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that patta has been granted in favour of the review petitioners.
REV.APLW No. 44 of 2025
2. If any person is aggrieved, they are at liberty to work out their remedy in the manner known to law under the relevant statute. Accordingly, the Review Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (D.B.C.,J.) 08-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No sp To
1. The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore – 607 001.
2. The Tahsildar, Bhuvanagiri Taluk, Cuddalore District.
3. The Executive Engineer, (Water Resources Department), Kollidam Drainage Division, Chidambaram, Chidambaram Taluk, Cuddalore District.
4. The Senior Project Officer, (Water Resources Department), Kollidam Drainage Division, Chidambaram, Chidambaram Taluk, Cuddalore District.
REV.APLW No. 44 of 2025
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J. sp REV.APLW No. 44 of 2025 AND WMP Nos. 2461 & 2462 OF 2025 08-09-2026