Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/4059/2026 of K.Vanamamalai Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by on 8 September 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 08.09.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE P. MURUGAN
WP.CRL.(MD). No.4059 of 2026
K. Vanamamalai
... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police,
Thoothukudi District,
Thoothukudi.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Thoothukudi District,
Thoothukudi.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Office of the Revenue Divisional Office, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.
4. The Tahsildar,
The Tahsildar Office,
Srivaikundam Taluk,
Thoothukudi District.
5. The Inspector of Police,
Cherakulam Police Station,
Thoothukudi District.
6. Pattani @ Krishnan
... Respondents
PRAYER :- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to instruct the 6th respondent to grant our villagers to perform the Kumbabishegam in the Arulmigu Sri Karaiyadi Sudalai Maadasami Pattani Swamy Kovil and the Arulmigu Mela Karaiyadi Sudalai Maadasami Pattani Swamy Koil, by considering the petitioner's representations dated 07.03.2026, 18.05.2026, 20.05.2026 and 22.06.2026 and take necessary action on the 6th respondent.
For Petitioner
: Mr.S.Selva Kumar
For Respondents : Mr. A. Sivasubramanian Additional Government Pleader for R3 and R4.
Mr. C. Susikumar
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
for R1, R2 and R5.
Mr. Aairam K. Selvakumar
for R6.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Heard both sides.
2. Mr. A. Sivasubramanian, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for 3rd and 4th respondents and Mr. C. Susikumar, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for the respondents 1, 2 and 5.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing in detail, when the Court posed certain query, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement in the bundle to that effect.
4. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 08.09.2026 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No psm To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Office, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.
4. The Tahsildar, The Tahsildar Office, Srivaikundam Taluk, Thoothukudi District.
5. The Inspector of Police, Cherakulam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.
6. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
DR. P. MURUGAN, J.
psm
WP. CRL.(MD) No.4059 of 2026 08.09.2026