Madras High Court

WP CRL.(MD)/5057/2026 of Malairaj Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

Dated : 08.09.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE P. MURUGAN

WP.CRL.(MD). No.5057 of 2026

Malairaj

... Petitioner

Vs.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu,

Rep. by the Superintendent of Police,

Office of the Superintendent of Police,

Tenkasi District.

2. The State of Tamilnadu,

Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

Courtallam Police Station,

Tenkasi District.

...Respondents

PRAYER :- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to take necessary action by way of conducting a speedy enquiry on petitioner's representation dated 31.07.2026, by strictly in accordance with the direction of the Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari Vs. Govt. of U.P. & others case, and pass such further or other orders as this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr. B. Anandan

For Respondents : Mr. D. Rajaboopathy

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

Heard both sides.

2. The writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to take necessary action by way of conducting a speedy enquiry on petitioner's representation dated 31.07.2026, by strictly in accordance with the direction of the Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari Vs. Govt. of U.P. & others case.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for the respondents 1 & 2. He submitted that the petitioner's complaint has been received and a CSR No.684 of 2026 was issued on 23.08.2026 and the petitioner's complaint was under consideration for enquiry.

4. Recording the above submission, without going into the merits of the case, the second respondent is directed to proceed further with enquiry and examine the complainant/petitioner as well as the rival party, and take a better decision within a period of six [6] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

08.09.2026 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No psa To

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District.

2. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Courtallam Police Station, Tenkasi District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

DR. P. MURUGAN, J. psa

WP.CRL.(MD). No.5057 of 2026

08.09.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead