Central Administrative Tribunal
G Geethakumari vs SOUTHERN RAILWAY on 27 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM Order Sheet Item no.: 43 O.A./145/2026 (ERNAKULAM) [ PENSION SCHEME ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 9 Order Dated: 27/10/2026 G GEETHAKUMARI Vs SOUTHERN RAILWAY For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Martin G. Thottan For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. N. Anilkumar, SPC Notes of The Registry Order of The Tribunal
When the matter was taken up, the learned Counsel for the applicant invited our attention to paragraph 24 of the reply statement wherein it is stated that the office of the Principal Financial Adviser, Southern Railway vide communication on the subject of coverage under the Old Pension Scheme in respect of the applicant has referred to Railway Board's letter dated 24.06.2026 and directed that the applicant's request may be considered as per the said directives. We are informed by the learned SPC that the matter is now pending before the competent authority. Let the competent authority take an informed decision on switching over to the Old Pension Scheme from the Unified Pension Scheme. The learned SPC shall get specific instructions on the outcome and inform us. Post on 30.11.2026. V RAMA MATHEW MEMBER (A) JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS MEMBER (J) Vishal ( steno 'c' )
Case No O.A./145/2026 Ernakulam Bench List In: Main causelist Item No. 43 Generated by Vishal CAT Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench on 27/10/2026
2026.10.27 16:52:28 +05'30' VISHAL