Madras High Court

REV.APLW/241/2026 of J.PADMAVATHY Vs K.DAMODARAN on 7 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

REV.APLW No. 241 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

REV.APLW No. 241 of 2026

AND

WMP Nos. 41181 and 41182 OF 2026

J.Padmavathy

W/o.R.Jayaramaswamy, No.10/43, Parasuraman Easwarar Koil West Mada Street, Ayanavaram, Chennai-23.

..Petitioners

Vs

1. K.Damodaran

S/o.Kannan, Old No.174, New No.15, 3rd

Street, Nehru Nagar, Anna Nagar West,

Chennai - 600 040.

2. The Member Secretary

Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Gandhi-irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

3. The Commissioner

Corporation Of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai.

4. Assistant Executive Engineer,

Zone-08, Division 97, Corporation Of

Chennai, Shenoy Nagar, Thiru Vika Park,

Chennai - 600 030.

REV.APLW No. 241 of 2026

5. Jayaraman,

Plot No.10, Parasurama Eswaran Koil, West Mada Street, Ayanavaram, Chennai - 23.

6. The Executive Officer,

Parasurama Eswaran Koil, Ayynavaram,

Chennai.

..Respondents

Prayer : Review Application under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of CPC to Review the order dated 28.04.2023 in WP.No. 1327/2019.

For Petitioner :

Mr.P.Siva

for Mr.R.Rajarajan

For Respondent(s):

No appearance

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

(Order of the Court was made by V.Lakshminarayanan, J.)

By the order dated 28.04.2023, this Court had directed the Corporation officials to issue notice to the petitioner in the writ petition as well as the fourth respondent in terms of their earlier notice issued during September 2018 and proceed in accordance with law.

2. The petitioner, who is a third party to the proceedings claims that as she is a tenant under the Temple, she is entitled to be put on notice. The direction is only to take action against the unauthorised construction in

REV.APLW No. 241 of 2026

accordance with law at the time of proceeding with the proposed action. We are certain that persons who are entitled to be put on notice will be put on notice. The petitioner cannot claim independent right from that of the Temple. That being the position, the petitioner cannot raise any independent right from the temple. The petitioner has not established any error apparent in the order warranting review. The Review Application stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (V.L.N.,J.) 07-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KST To

1. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Gandhi-irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

2. The Commissioner, Corporation Of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai.

3. Assistant Executive Engineer, Zone-08, Division 97, Corporation Of Chennai, Shenoy Nagar, Thiru Vika Park, Chennai - 600 030.

4. The Executive Officer, Parasurama Eswaran Koil, Ayynavaram, Chennai.

REV.APLW No. 241 of 2026

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J. KST REV.APLW No. 241 of 2026 07-09-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead