Madras High Court

WP/32777/2026 of Rajkumar Vs The District Collector on 7 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07-09-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE E.MANOHARAN

Writ Petition Nos. 32777, 32785 & 32794 of 2026

and

W.M.P.Nos. 36002, 36022, 36023 & 36040 of 2026

Rajkumar

..Petitioner in

W.P.No.32777/2026

Sundaramoorthy

..Petitioner in

W.P.No.32777/2026

Krishnamoorthy

..Petitioner in

W.P.No.32777/2026

Vs.

1. The District Collector,

Tiruvannamalai District.

2. The Tashildar,

Chetpet Taluk,

Tiruvannamalai District 632 231.

..Respondents in all

Cases

Common Prayer : Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for records relating to the 7 notice dated 15.06.2026 in Na.Ka.No.A2/6005/2025

issued by the 2nd respondent and 6 notice dated 01.07.2026 in Na.Ka.No.A2/6005/2025 issued by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and

consequently direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioners Appeal dated 24.07.2026 under section 10 of Land Encroachment Act 1905 within a time frame may be fixed by this Hon’ble Court.

For Petitioner in all

cases

Mr.M.Gnanasekar

For Respondents:

Mr.B.Siva Kollappan

Additional Government Pleader

(in all cases)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

COMMON ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by Dr.G.Jayachandran J.) These Writ Petitions have been filed challenging the eviction notice issued by the Tahsildar, Chetpet Taluk, since the petitioners were identified as encroachers upon the “Eri Poramboke”.

2. Simultaneously, the writ petitioners preferred an appeal to the District Collector, the first respondent herein, under Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the hearing of the appeal has been fixed by the first respondent on 10.09.2026. He further submitted that based on the outcome of the appeal, further action will be taken.

4. Recording the said submissions, these Writ Petitions are disposed of, directing the respondents to act in accordance with law. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs. (Dr.G.J.,J.) (E.M.,J.) 07-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No rpl To

1. The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai District.

2. The Tashildar, Chetpet Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District 632 231.

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN J. and E.MANOHARAN J. rpl Writ Petition Nos. 32777, 32785 & 32794 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos. 36002, 36022, 36023 & 36040 of 2026 07-09-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead