Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/4816/2026 of Sekar Vs The Superintendent of Police on 7 September 2026
WP.CRL.(MD). No.4816 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 07.09.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE P. MURUGAN
WP.CRL.(MD). No.4816 of 2026
Sekar
... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police,
Thoothukudi District,
Thoothukudi.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Athoor Police Station,
Thoothukudi District.
3. The Manager
M/s. Cholamandala Finance Company Limited (HL), Tiruchendur Branch, Annanam Hospital 1st Floor, Door No. 105-18, Kamarapuram, Tiruchendur – 628215,
... Respondents
( Uploaded on: 10/09/2026 03:42:00 pm )
WP.CRL.(MD). No.4816 of 2026
PRAYER :- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus or order or direction in the nature of writ to direct the 2nd respondent to take necessary action based on the petitioner's representation dated 22.06.2026.
For Petitioner
: Mr.S.Muniyandi
For Respondents : Mr.C.Susikumar
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
for R1 and R2.
Mr.P. Narayana Sudalaimuthu
for R3.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Heard both sides.
2. Mr.C.Susikumar, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for 1st and 2nd respondents and Mr.P.Narayana Sudalaimuthu, learned counsel takes notice for the 3rd respondent.
3. The relief sought for by the writ petitioner is to direct the 2nd respondent to take necessary action based on the petitioner's representation dated 22.06.2026. When the matter was taken up for
( Uploaded on: 10/09/2026 03:42:00 pm )
WP.CRL.(MD). No.4816 of 2026 consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, as per the police enquiry it is revealed that the enquiry has been closed and liberty is given to the petitioner to workout the remedy before the civil forum. As per the instructions given to the petitioner counsel, the counsel submitted like so.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that, it is true that the petition enquiry was closed, leaving the party to workout the remedy before the civil forum and the closer report, is not sent so far and it will be sent to the Court in due course.
5. Recording both the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed, as the enquiry has been completed and closed, and liberty is given to the petitioner to workout further remedy before appropriate forum. 07.09.2026 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No psm
( Uploaded on: 10/09/2026 03:42:00 pm )
WP.CRL.(MD). No.4816 of 2026 To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.
2. The Inspector of Police, Athoor Police Station, Thoothukudi District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
( Uploaded on: 10/09/2026 03:42:00 pm )
WP.CRL.(MD). No.4816 of 2026 DR. P. MURUGAN, J.
psm
WP. CRL.(MD) No.4816 of 2026 07.09.2026
( Uploaded on: 10/09/2026 03:42:00 pm )