Madras High Court
WP CRL.(MD)/5015/2026 of Ayyavu Vs The State of Tamilnadu rep by on 7 September 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 07.09.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE P. MURUGAN
WP.CRL.(MD). No.5015 of 2026
Ayyavu
... Petitioner
Vs.
1. State of Tamil Nadu
Rep. by the the Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.
2. State of Tamil Nadu
Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Musiri, Trichy District.
3. State of Tamil Nadu
Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
Pulivalam Police Station,
Trichy District.
...Respondents
PRAYER :- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ or Order or direction in the nature of Writ, directing the 3rd Respondent to complete the speedy enquiry on the representations of the Petitioner dated 09.02.2026, 25.02.2026 and to take necessary action in accordance with law within the time stipulated and to pass such further or other orders as this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr. A.Joel Paul Antony
For Respondents : Mr. D. Rajaboopathy
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Heard both sides and perused the records.
2. The prayer in the Writ Petition is to direct the 3rd Respondent to complete the speedy enquiry on the representations of the Petitioner dated 09.02.2026 and 25.02.2026 and to take necessary action in accordance with law within the time stipulated.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for the Respondents No.1 to 3.
4. Since the petitioner has come up seeking the direction, without going into the merits of the case, considering the arguments of the respondents side that the current paper submitted by the petitioner to the Superintendent of Police, Trichy District has been received by the third respondent and hearing date has been fixed to enquire the petitioner as well as the rival party, who is the son of the petitioner, recording the above development, the third respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry on the representation of the petitioner, record the statements and then decide the case on merits and dispose of the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. 07.09.2026 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No psa
To
1. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the the Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.
2. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Musiri, Trichy District.
3. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Pulivalam Police Station, Trichy District.
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
DR. P. MURUGAN, J. psa
WP.CRL.(MD). No.5015 of 2026
07.09.2026