Madras High Court
WP/27699/2024 of K.RAJENDIRAN Vs THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION on 3 September 2026
WP No. 27699 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNASWAMY GOVINDARAJAN
WP No. 27699 of 2024
1. K.Rajendiran
2. J.Arokia Anbarasi
3. Prabaharan
4. R.Govindaraju
5. R.Jayaseelan
6. Nalini.P
7. M.Shankar
8. C.Venkatesan
9. V.Thangadurai
10.I.Nakkeeran
11.A.Gunaseelan
12.D.Dhamayanthi
13.R.Radha
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Director Of Municipal Administration 75, Raja Anamalaipuram, Mrc Nagar, Chennai-600 028
WP No. 27699 of 2024
2. The Principal Secretary
Municipal Administration And Water Supply Department, 8th Floor, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009
..Respondent(s)
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India issuing writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein to consider the grievance of the petitioners with respect to fixation of seniority AEE (Assistant Executive Engineer) to EE(Executive Engineer) by taking into consideration the date of entry into service to the post of Assistant Engineer or in the alternative by fixing a ratio for further promotion to the post of Executive Engineer between the erstwhile employees of Municipalities and the employees of the Greater Chennai corporation by appointing a committee constituted of members For Petitioner(s):
Ms.Dakshayani Reddy
Senior Counsel For Ms.S.Suneetha
For Respondent(s):
Ms.Kavitha Nithiyanandhan Rameshwar
Additional Advocate General asst. By
Mr.A.R.Suresh
Special Government Pleader for R1 & 2
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives in the present petition. She has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court record.
WP No. 27699 of 2024
2. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.G.R.,J.) 03-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GD To
1. The Director Of Municipal Administration 75, Raja Anamalaipuram, Mrc Nagar, Chennai-600 028
2. The Principal Secretary Municipal Administration And Water Supply Department, 8th Floor, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009
WP No. 27699 of 2024
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND KRISHNASWAMY GOVINDARAJAN, J. GD WP No. 27699 of 2024 03-09-2026