Madras High Court
REV.APPL/218/2026 of Teachers Recruitment Board Vs R Thamil Mani on 1 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
REV.APPL No. 218, 214 & 219 OF 2026
and
CMP Nos.24858, 24854 & 24861 of 2026
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. R Thamil Mani
REV.APPL No. 214 of 2026
..Petitioner (s)
Vs
1. D. Rajeshkannan
REV.APPL No. 219 of 2026
..Petitioner (s)
Vs
1. S.Muruganandhan
Prayer: Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 r/w Section 114 of CPC
to review the judgment dated 12.06.2025 in WA.No.1434 of 2025 on the file of this Honble Court.
REV.APPL No. 214 of 2026
Prayer: Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 r/w Section 114 of CPC
to review the judgment dated 12.06.2025 in WA No.1432 of 2025 on the file of this Honourable Court.
REV.APPL No. 219 of 2026
Prayer: Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 r/w Section 114 of CPC
to review the judgment dated 12.06.2025 in W.A.No.1420 of 2025 on the file of this Hon'ble Court.
In all cases
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.C Kathiravan
For Respondent(s):
Mr.K.Balu for R1
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Grounds for appeal cannot be considered to review the order already passed by this Court after adjudicating the issues.
2. The learned counsel for the review petitioner would mainly contend that the grounds in entirety raised by the review petitioner had not been considered by this Court and thus, the petitioner has chosen to file the review petitions.
3. Merits involved in a case cannot be adjudicated in a review petition. Re-adjudication or appreciation of facts once again in a review petition is beyond the scope of Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC. In the present cases, the grounds raised would show that certain grounds raised by the petitioner are not considered by the Court, which would not provide a cause for institution of review proceedings. However, no error apparent on record has been established by the petitioner.
4. Thus, the review petitions are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.G.T.,J.) 01-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SLI
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI J. SLI To The State of Tamil Nadu
REV.APPL No. 218, 214 & 219 OF 2026 and CMP Nos.24858, 24854 & 24861 of 2026 01-09-2026