Madras High Court
REV.APPL/221/2026 of THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT Vs P.NARAYANAN on 1 September 2026
REV.APPL No. 221 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
REV.APPL No. 221 of 2026
and
CMP No.24867 of 2026
1. The Secretary To Government
Personnel And Administrative Reforms
Department,
Secretariat, Chennai 600009.
2. The Secretary To Government
Finance Department,
Secretariat, Chennai 600009.
3. The Under Secretary To Government
Finance Department,
Secretariat, Chennai 600009.
4. The Secretary To Government
Agriculture Department,
Secretariat, Chennai 600009.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. P.Narayanan
2. V.Vimala
..Respondent(s)
Prayer: Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of CPC to review the order dated 07.02.2023 passed in WA No. 1995 of 2012 and allow this review application.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.A.R.Suresh
Special Government Pleader
REV.APPL No. 221 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) State preferred the present review application seeking review of the order of this Court dated 07.02.2023, passed in W.A.No.1995 of 2012.
2. The learned Special Government Pleader would submit that Rule 35(aa) of the Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Services Rules has been wrongly applied in this case and therefore, the order has to be reviewed.
3. Perusal of the other grounds raised in the review application would show that an attempt has been made to re-adjudciate the issue which is impermissible under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC. The scope of review cannot be expanded by the re-adjudicating the issues already considered by this Court.
4. Since the petitioner has not established any error apparent warranting interference and exercise of the powers of the judicial review, the present review application stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.G.T.,J.) 01-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SLI
REV.APPL No. 221 of 2026
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. SLI REV.APPL No. 221 of 2026 01-09-2026