Madras High Court
REV.APPL/227/2026 of The Registrar Vs S.R.Prabagaran on 1 September 2026
REV.APPL Nos. 227, 215, 216, 224, 223 & 222 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01-09-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
REV.APPL Nos. 227, 215, 216, 224, 223 & 222 of 2026
REV.APPL No. 227 of 2026
and
CMP No.24939 of 2026
The Registrar
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. Dr.S.R.Prabagaran
S/o.Ramatchandirane S,
Professor,
Department of Bio Technology,
Bharathiyar University,
Coimbatore.
2. The Regional Joint Director
O/o. The Regional Joint Director,
Local Fund Audit Department,
Coimbatore 641 001.
3. The Assistant Director
Local Fund Audit,
4. The University Grant Commission (UGC), Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110 002.
..Respondent(s)
Prayer: Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of CPC to review the order dated 11.06.2025 passed in WA No.1559/2025 and allow the Review Application as prayed for.
REV.APPL Nos. 227, 215, 216, 224, 223 & 222 of 2026
In all cases:
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.S.Nambi Arooran
for M/s.Ajmal Associates
For Respondent(s):
Mr.M.Thirumurugan
for Mr.R.Ramachandran for R1
Mr.A.R.Suresh
Special Government Pleader for R2
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Grounds for appeal cannot be considered to review the order already passed by this Court after adjudicating the issues.
2. The learned counsel for the review petitioner would mainly contend that the grounds in entirety raised by the review petitioner had not been considered by this Court and thus, the petitioner has chosen to file the review petitions.
3. Merits involved in a case cannot be adjudicated in a review petition. Re-adjudication or appreciation of facts once again in a review petition is beyond the scope of Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC. In the present cases, the grounds raised would show that certain grounds raised by the petitioner are not considered by the Court, which would not provide a cause for institution of review proceedings. However, no error apparent on record has been established by the petitioner.
REV.APPL Nos. 227, 215, 216, 224, 223 & 222 of 2026
4. Thus, the review petitions are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.G.T.,J.) 01-09-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SLI Note: Registry is directed to type the remaining cause titles. To
1. The Regional Joint Director O/o. The Regional Joint Director, Local Fund Audit Department, Coimbatore 641 001.
2. The Assistant Director Local Fund Audit,
3. The University Grant Commission (UGC), Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110 002.
REV.APPL Nos. 227, 215, 216, 224, 223 & 222 of 2026
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. SLI REV.APPL Nos. 227, 215, 216, 224, 223 & 222 of 2026 01-09-2026